Two separate questions
A sterility test and an endotoxin test are often mentioned in the same breath, but they measure different things. Sterility asks whether the material contains living microorganisms. Endotoxin asks whether lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fragments from Gram-negative bacterial cell walls are present in amounts that could confound research downstream.
Autoclaving kills organisms but does not destroy their endotoxin. A lot can be sterile and still fail an endotoxin specification. Both assays exist because both failure modes matter to different kinds of experiments.
Sterility and bioburden
A bioburden count reports total viable organisms per gram or per milliliter, usually expressed in colony-forming units (CFU). A sterility test asks the stricter question — are any organisms present at all — and is validated for materials where the answer must be no.
- Methods include direct inoculation into growth media and membrane filtration for materials that inhibit growth.
- Reports state the incubation media, temperature, and duration.
- A negative sterility result is only meaningful for the specific sample tested, drawn under aseptic conditions.
Endotoxin testing (LAL and rFC)
The dominant endotoxin assay is the Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay, which detects LPS through the clotting cascade of horseshoe crab hemolymph. It is available in three formats:
- Gel-clot: qualitative, low-cost, and simple.
- Kinetic turbidimetric: quantitative by measuring turbidity development over time.
- Kinetic chromogenic: quantitative by measuring cleavage of a chromogenic substrate; the most commonly reported format on research peptide COAs.
A newer alternative uses recombinant Factor C (rFC), which uses a recombinant enzyme in place of the traditional lysate reagent and reads out fluorimetrically. Both approaches report results in endotoxin units per milligram of material (EU/mg).
What a credible report looks like
- Assay type named explicitly (kinetic chromogenic LAL, rFC, gel-clot, etc.).
- Standard curve summary with reported r² for kinetic methods.
- Sample preparation described (dilution factor, diluent).
- Positive product control (spike recovery) included and within the accepted 50 to 200 percent range.
- Result reported with units and the lot the material came from.
Fitting it into a full lot release
Endotoxin and sterility testing sit alongside HPLC purity and LC-MS identity on a full lot report. For the analytical pieces see HPLC Purity Testing Explained and How to Read a Peptide COA. For our approach across all lots, see our testing standards.
